Previous Article
News
EAW AWARE: Arrest Warrant European
EAW AWARE: Training judges, public prosecutors and lawyers in alternatives to the EAW is key to proportionate use
The EAW AWARE project was designed in 2019 around a seminar series, to incorporate different perspectives of European practitioner experience and more effectively address known challenges of EAW implementation and policy: decision-making information, use of existing provisions in national law, and informal judicial cooperation. Our focus was on prison conditions in the application of the EAW, since in key issues such as overcrowding, or sanitary conditions the ECtHR has often found violations of Article 3. Aggravating factors – such as access to natural light, heating and ventilation – lead to further dispute, as do compensating factors such as out of cell time and activities.
Indeed, in the first of our three seminars, in October 2019 in Bremen, we brought together 28 European judges, public prosecutors, lawyers and academics to discuss issues concerning the precise scope and content of relevant duties and factors on the part of the executing Member States’ courts. Through presentations and discussions, practical solutions for the future were informally worked through, such as enhanced databases, the facilitation of closer co-operation between judicial authorities of the issuing and executing the Member States. Specialist lawyers presented the perspective of suspects and legal practitioners on extradition proceedings, with a focus on possibilities for avoiding detention.
However, this project’s unique perspective was provided by on-site visits to detention facilities during each 3-day seminar. In Bremen, participants made on-site visits to both Bremen Prison and Bremen Secure Treatment Unit of the Psychiatric Treatment Centre. Judges, prosecutors and lawyers heard first-hand accounts from prison and probation staff, and the visits fuelled the discussion that detention conditions are nuanced, contextual and complex, and cannot be understood as either an “east vs. west” issue nor as the fault of ‘unwilling regimes’. Instead, improved conditions depend on investment in Europe’s justice systems, and the capacity for renovation. How we invest in our systems and the staff who work in them must often change to accommodate emerging factors such as new prisoner demographics. And all these dynamic factors must be addressed within the uniquely challenging requirements of secure environments.
These onsite visits ultimately led to a better understanding of the human rights relevance of detention conditions, with a particular emphasis on the need for open communication between the relevant authorities ‒ in the European spirit of mutual trust and cooperation. Indeed, 75% of the Bremen Seminar participants had never visited a prison outside of their own country before. More than half had never visited a secure treatment facility in their own country and 92% of participants had never visited this kind of facility outside of their own country before.
Spending time on-site, discussions became more open, and 87% of participants said visiting facilities had a greater impact than learning about detention conditions in other ways. There was greater recognition that detention – particularly in a foreign environment – is a harsh consequence on the lives of the people concerned. EAWs are an effective legal tool, which uproots people from their families and lives, deporting them to a country where they may not speak the language or have any support, reducing their chances of finding accommodation and work on release and perhaps even – one presenter suggested – reducing trust in European rights and freedoms.
Unfortunately, due to the pandemic, we were only able to meet in person once during this two-year project. Whilst we continued the EAW AWARE seminar series online with excellent presenters – including visual material from a range of European prisons – we lacked the breakthrough moments these on-site visits had provoked. Nonetheless, a new bond had been created between participants, and open discussions continued on less restrictive alternative cross border criminal justice mechanisms have been adopted by the EU, including:
- European Supervision Order (ESO), which allows a judicial authority to impose pre-trial supervision measures, such as an electronic bracelet, on a person residing in another;
- European Investigation Order (EIO), which allows investigating authorities to gather evidence across borders such as testimonies via video link without having to request that persons be arrested and physically transferred;
- European Probation Order (‘EPO’) regarding the recognition and supervision of suspended sentences, alternative sanctions and conditional sentences and
- Framework decision 2008/909/JHA on transfer of prisoners. In fact, had it not been for restricted travel, EAW AWARE judges and prosecutors had planned to participate in the PONT training developed for competent authorities on Framework Decisions 947/2008 and 829/2009 https://probationobservatory.eu/resources/
The EAW AWARE Project was a learning network: By bringing users of the EAW tool together with such a diverse, practical agenda, these online seminars continued to support mutual trust and recognition of decisions between neighbouring European judiciaries and to promote consistent use of European bodies. These discussions between practitioners generated significant insightful and useful case studies, precedence and problem-solving. This content was transferred for wider circulation into three ‘e-zines’, one on the results of each seminar, freely downloadable from the eawaware.eu project website. In addition to this narrative material, project outcomes were used to build an EAW Procedural Assessment Tool. This is a basic instrument but widely referenced, and designed to facilitate judicial decision making in extradition cases. Since pandemic restrictions made travel impossible, at the end of the project the partnership channelled our efforts instead into an e-learning course which makes condensed, theoretical material from the project available in English, German, Portuguese and Romanian. Finally, the need for more training in alternatives to detention is one of three central messages in the EAW AWARE White Paper on EAW and Detention Conditions, which you can access via the website: www.eawaware.eu
The EAW AWARE project was funded by the European Commission Justice Programme and led by Bremen Ministry of Justice and Constitution and Bremen Higher Regional Court of Appeal (Germany), with the support of partners Superior Council of Magistracy (SCM) (Romania), IPS (Portugal) and Antigone (Italy), and guided by an Advisory Committee of Loyola University (Spain) and the National School of Judiciary and Public Prosecution (KSSIP) (Poland). The network remains active online, and anyone interested in furthering this exchange is warmly encouraged to join the discussion on LinkedIn via the group European Arrest Warrant AWARE: https://www.linkedin.com/groups/8768048/ or to get in touch with EAW AWARE Project Coordinator, Rhianon Williams (rhianon.williams@justiz.bremen.de).
– Rhianon Williams

Related News
Keep up to date with the latest developments, stories, and updates on probation from across Europe and beyond. Find relevant news and insights shaping the field today.
New
Alternatives to pre-trial detention, Community Sanctions and Measures, Framework Decisions, Technology
Future of Criminal Justice: CEP’s Contribution to Key 2025 Dialogues
27/01/2026
Throughout 2025, CEP and its representatives actively participated in the online Technical meetings ahead of the HLF as well as the High Level Forum on Future of Criminal Justice taking place on 4-5 March 2025, 20-21 May 2025 and 1-2 October 2025 in Brussels, Belgium.
Recap
Alternatives to pre-trial detention
Recap: Webinar on Alternatives to Detention 2026
26/01/2026
On Thursday 22 January, CEP hosted the first webinar of 2025 on the topic of Alternatives to Detention. The session led by Ms. Marina Pajoni from the French Prison and Probation Service titled „Problem Solving Justice in Pracitce: The Meuse Probation Service´s Approach to Drug Addiction“ introduced an innovative programme developed by the Meuse Probation Service in close cooperation with the French Ministry of Justice.
New
Education and Training
CEP launches an interactive European map of probation education and training institution contacts
22/01/2026
The CEP is pleased to inform its members that a new dedicated section has been developed on the CEP website featuring an interactive map of Europe.
New
CEP Events
CEP activity calendar 2026
20/01/2026
As we begin the new year, we would like to thank all CEP members, partners, and participants for your continued engagement and valuable contributions. Your involvement plays an essential role in shaping CEP’s work and activities.
We are pleased to share the CEP calendar for 2026, which provides an overview of the events planned for the year ahead. We look forward to continuing our collaboration and welcoming you to upcoming CEP activities throughout the year.
Thank you for being part of the CEP community.
New
CEP members, Gender-based violence
Interventions Alliance’s Eden House Recognized as Outstanding
15/01/2026
CEP is delighted to share that Eden House, an Interventions Alliance residential service for women with high-risk or complex needs on probation, has been rated “Outstanding” overall by HM Inspectorate of Probation. In 2022, Eden House was honored with the CEP Public Protection Award. Our sincere congratulations to the team for this remarkable achievement.
New
Education and Training
The Judicial Training Dashboard
14/01/2026
The European Training Platform (ETP) is a search tool for justice professionals. You can find self-learning materials on a great variety of EU law practice areas and related topics, as well as links to training providers’ homepages and course catalogues.
Subscribe to our bi-monthly email newsletter!
"*" indicates required fields
- Keep up to date with important probation developments and insights.