Skip to content

News

The Dutch new Law on Punishment and Protection

As per 1 July 2021, the Law on Punishment and Protection partially entered into force. This law has consequences for detainees and victims, next of kin and other relevant persons who believe that they should be equated with victims.

The law regulates the limitation of conditional release: if one received a custodial sentence of 30 years, he or she was eligible for conditional release after 20 years. With the new Law on Punishment and Protection however, this conditional release is limited to two years, meaning that with a custodial sentence of 30 years one is now eligible for a conditional release after 28 years.

The Law has also stipulated that when making decisions about granting liberties and possibilities to detainees, like reintegration leave or eligibility for a penitentiary program or conditional release, the following aspects must explicitly be taken into account:

  1. The behavior of detainees during detention,
  2. The risk for society when granting liberties to offenders,
  3. The protection needs and other interests of victims, surviving relatives and other relevant persons (such as children, witnesses but also legal persons).

Protection of victims

In this article we focus on the third point. The “what” is clear: the need for protection and other interests should be seriously considered. The “how” – we will specify this here. Informing and consulting victims, next of kin and other relevant persons, that is what should be done. For years this has been done on a limited scale only (mostly for offenses in which victims have the right to speak) by employees of the Public Prosecution Service who work at the “Informatiepunt Detentie Verloop”  IDV (information point on the course and progress of a detention, red.).

On 25th August 2021 the Minister of Legal Protection has expressed the intention that all information and consultation tasks, performed during the execution or implementation phase, should be executed directly under the Minister’s own responsibility.

Already as per July last year the CJIB (Judicial Debt Collection Agency, red.) has been working together with the Public Prosecution Service and IDV in a partnership set up for this purpose, to inform and consult victims and other relevant people involved. The aim is to take their interests into account during the decision process regarding conditional release and placement of detainees in a care institution, based on of Article 43.4 of the Penitentiary Principles Act (PBW).

As per 1st December2021, decisions about participation in a Penitentiary Program (PP) have been added to this, and decisions about granting reintegration leave will be added in the course of 2022. With the implementation of this last aspect, the Law on Punishment and Protection has been fully implemented.

In total this concerns thousands of decisions in which the three aforementioned issues must be taken into account: the behaviour of detainees, the risk for society and the interests of victims. This is a major operation with a big impact on the executing organizations in the criminal justice chain such as the Custodial Institutions Agency, the Probation organizations, the Public Prosecution Service and the CJIB.

How?

How is CJIB going to consult and inform victims, next of kin and other relevant persons? They will try to specify this here, without pretending to be able to tell everything as it is all work in progress.

They have put together some important principles for the communication between Government and Citizens: “We want to be a committed, empathetic government and, as much as possible, allow citizens to be in control of their own actions. A government that is well aware of having to deal with many vulnerable citizens, citizens who have experienced a profound, traumatic experience in their lives or in that of their loved ones.”

In order to take these principles into account, Victim Support Netherlands and the Federation of Victims of Violent Crimes were asked for their advice when setting up a work organization concerning this topic. The answers these organizations gave mainly referred to the importance of how to treat people (in a personal way, respectful, timely, all inclusive, tailor-made).

The CJIB is now setting up a work organization in which both digital means, written means, telephone and face-to-face contact will be used for communication. The organization thinks that the latter should only be necessary in exceptional cases like media-sensitive or politically sensitive cases, cases that had a big impact on society and cases that require a personal approach, in line with the need.

First experiences

Much of this work is customized and tailor-made. This requires knowledge, skills and experience from the involved professionals in order to be able to work in a safe and person-oriented manner. The CJIB is paying attention to that and in the meantime the first experiences are being realized – experiences that they would very much like to share with the CEP network at a later stage, in order to learn from each other and to invest in (future) best practices.

Related News

Keep up to date with the latest developments, stories, and updates on probation from across Europe and beyond. Find relevant news and insights shaping the field today.

Recap

CEP Events, CEP members, Gender-based violence

CEP 15th General Assembly and International Conference on Gender-Based Violence in Probation

16/10/2025

From 14 to 16 October 2025, Vienna hosted the 15th CEP General Assembly and the CEP International Conference on Gender-Based Violence in Probation: Challenges and Lessons Learned. The event, organized in cooperation with NEUSTART, brought together over 100 CEP members, probation professionals, policymakers, and researchers from across Europe to reflect, exchange experiences, and discuss the topic of gender-based violence from the perspective of probation, restorative justice and prison.

Probation in Europe

New Vodcast Episode: Leo Tigges on Probation Capacity Building

09/10/2025

The 15th episode of Division_Y features Leo Tigges, a freelancing consultant and former Secretary General of the Confederation of European Probation (CEP).

In this episode, host Jo Tein (CEP board member) speaks with Leo about his professional journey and his co-authored publication with Steve Pitts on Probation Capacity Building. The discussion highlights international collaboration, knowledge exchange, and strategies for strengthening probation systems across Europe.

▶️ Watch the full interview (English with German subtitles) below

New

Framework Decisions

CEP Updates Framework Decision 947 Guides

06/10/2025

CEP has released updated versions of its guides for persons under probation supervision and for probation staff, reflecting its continued commitment to cross-border cooperation in criminal justice. These revisions aim to promote broader use of Framework Decision 947, which facilitates the mutual recognition of probation measures and alternative sanctions across EU member states.

 

The guides are to be found here.

Recap

ITSCCS

Building Core Skills, Building Connections: V edition of the ITSCCS 2025 in Barcelona

03/10/2025

Barcelona was the stage for the CEP International Training School on Core Correctional Skills (ITSCCS) 2025, held from 29 September to 3 October. Over five days, the Centre d’Estudis Jurídics i Formació Especialitzada became a hub for practitioners eager to sharpen the practical tools that define effective work in the criminal justice field.

Recap

Partners

CEP participated at the 14th Annual General Meeting of EuroPris

01/10/2025

On 23 September 2025, in Krakow, Poland, Jana Spero Kamenjarin, CEP Secretary General, participated in the 14th Annual General Meeting (AGM) of EuroPris.

Recap

CEP Board, Probation in Europe

30th Council of Europe CDPPS Conference: Can we move away from the overuse of penal sanctions?

01/10/2025

On 24–25 September 2025, Kraków, Poland, hosted the 30th Council of Europe Conference of Directors of Prison and Probation Services (CDPPS) under the theme “Can we move away from the overuse of penal sanctions?”. The event gathered high-level participants — Directors General from member and observer states and representatives of the supporting organisations.

Subscribe to our bi-monthly email newsletter!