Skip to content

News

The Dutch new Law on Punishment and Protection

As per 1 July 2021, the Law on Punishment and Protection partially entered into force. This law has consequences for detainees and victims, next of kin and other relevant persons who believe that they should be equated with victims.

The law regulates the limitation of conditional release: if one received a custodial sentence of 30 years, he or she was eligible for conditional release after 20 years. With the new Law on Punishment and Protection however, this conditional release is limited to two years, meaning that with a custodial sentence of 30 years one is now eligible for a conditional release after 28 years.

The Law has also stipulated that when making decisions about granting liberties and possibilities to detainees, like reintegration leave or eligibility for a penitentiary program or conditional release, the following aspects must explicitly be taken into account:

  1. The behavior of detainees during detention,
  2. The risk for society when granting liberties to offenders,
  3. The protection needs and other interests of victims, surviving relatives and other relevant persons (such as children, witnesses but also legal persons).

Protection of victims

In this article we focus on the third point. The “what” is clear: the need for protection and other interests should be seriously considered. The “how” – we will specify this here. Informing and consulting victims, next of kin and other relevant persons, that is what should be done. For years this has been done on a limited scale only (mostly for offenses in which victims have the right to speak) by employees of the Public Prosecution Service who work at the “Informatiepunt Detentie Verloop”  IDV (information point on the course and progress of a detention, red.).

On 25th August 2021 the Minister of Legal Protection has expressed the intention that all information and consultation tasks, performed during the execution or implementation phase, should be executed directly under the Minister’s own responsibility.

Already as per July last year the CJIB (Judicial Debt Collection Agency, red.) has been working together with the Public Prosecution Service and IDV in a partnership set up for this purpose, to inform and consult victims and other relevant people involved. The aim is to take their interests into account during the decision process regarding conditional release and placement of detainees in a care institution, based on of Article 43.4 of the Penitentiary Principles Act (PBW).

As per 1st December2021, decisions about participation in a Penitentiary Program (PP) have been added to this, and decisions about granting reintegration leave will be added in the course of 2022. With the implementation of this last aspect, the Law on Punishment and Protection has been fully implemented.

In total this concerns thousands of decisions in which the three aforementioned issues must be taken into account: the behaviour of detainees, the risk for society and the interests of victims. This is a major operation with a big impact on the executing organizations in the criminal justice chain such as the Custodial Institutions Agency, the Probation organizations, the Public Prosecution Service and the CJIB.

How?

How is CJIB going to consult and inform victims, next of kin and other relevant persons? They will try to specify this here, without pretending to be able to tell everything as it is all work in progress.

They have put together some important principles for the communication between Government and Citizens: “We want to be a committed, empathetic government and, as much as possible, allow citizens to be in control of their own actions. A government that is well aware of having to deal with many vulnerable citizens, citizens who have experienced a profound, traumatic experience in their lives or in that of their loved ones.”

In order to take these principles into account, Victim Support Netherlands and the Federation of Victims of Violent Crimes were asked for their advice when setting up a work organization concerning this topic. The answers these organizations gave mainly referred to the importance of how to treat people (in a personal way, respectful, timely, all inclusive, tailor-made).

The CJIB is now setting up a work organization in which both digital means, written means, telephone and face-to-face contact will be used for communication. The organization thinks that the latter should only be necessary in exceptional cases like media-sensitive or politically sensitive cases, cases that had a big impact on society and cases that require a personal approach, in line with the need.

First experiences

Much of this work is customized and tailor-made. This requires knowledge, skills and experience from the involved professionals in order to be able to work in a safe and person-oriented manner. The CJIB is paying attention to that and in the meantime the first experiences are being realized – experiences that they would very much like to share with the CEP network at a later stage, in order to learn from each other and to invest in (future) best practices.

Related News

Keep up to date with the latest developments, stories, and updates on probation from across Europe and beyond. Find relevant news and insights shaping the field today.

Recap

Probation outside Europe

Governance Oversight and Accountability Mechanisms in Probation and Parole: Compare and Contrast Europe and USA

19/09/2025

Confederation of European Probation (CEP) and American Probation and Parole Association (APPA) organized an insightful webinar that introduced the theme “Governance oversight and accountability mechanisms in Probation and Parole. Compare and contrast Europe and USA”. This event took place on Thursday, 18 September 2025.

Recap

CEP Events, Framework Decisions

Recap: Expert Workshop on Framework Decision 2008/947/JHA and 2009/829/JHA

16/09/2025

The Expert Workshop held on September 10–11, 2025, in Brussels, Belgium, brought together senior managers, probation practitioners, criminal justice professionals such as lawyers and prosecutors from across Europe as well as representatives of the European Commission, Academy of European Law and European Judicial Network to discuss the advancements in the implementation of Framework Decisions 2008/947/JHA and 2009/829/JHA. Hosted at the Houses of Justice, the CEP Expert Workshop served as a dynamic platform for mutual learning, collaboration, and strategic planning.

New

Probation in Europe

New Vodcast Episode: Katharina Heitz on the Ressources-Risk-Inventory in Probation

11/09/2025

The 14th episode of Division_Y features Katharina Heitz, Head of the Central Department for Social Work at the Public Probation and Parole Service Baden-Württemberg, Germany.

Recap

CEP Board, Probation in Europe

CEP at ESC 2025: Penal Policy Transfer and Ageing in Prison in Focus

08/09/2025

The Confederation of European Probation (CEP) had a strong presence at the 25th Annual Conference of the European Society of Criminology (EUROCRIM 2025), held in Athens from 3 to 6 September 2025. As one of Europe’s largest gatherings of criminologists, the ESC annual conference brings together researchers, practitioners, and policymakers from around the world to exchange knowledge on crime, justice, and social responses. This year’s theme was “Logos of Crime and Punishment,” inspired by classical Greek philosophy.

Probation in Europe, Technology

Have Your Say: EU Call for Evidence on the Digitalisation of Justice (2025–2030)

18/08/2025

The European Commission has opened a Call for Evidence on the Digitalisation of Justice: 2025–2030 European Judicial Training Strategy.

Reading corner

Criminal Justice

Parole Futures

18/08/2025

At a time when many parole systems are experiencing considerable strain, the aims of this collection are twofold: first, to encourage systematic and critical reflection on the rationalities, institutions and practices of parole. Second, to think big, and pose ambitious ‘what if’ questions about the possible futures of parole and prison release. Offering novel insights from Asia, Australia, Europe, North America and South America, this collection builds the case for, and then showcases, a ‘way of doing’ parole research that is global in outlook, interdisciplinary in approach and unapologetically normative in character.

Subscribe to our bi-monthly email newsletter!