Previous Article
News
Interview with Christelle Rinchard, an officer in charge of victim support in Charleroi, Belgium
How do you experience working during the Covid-19 pandemic?
Quite badly actually. We are a team of four officers working in the same office. Almost overnight, we could only come to the office one at a time, in turns. We weren’t really equipped for working from home yet as we didn’t do it before and we found
ourselves completely inefficient when we teleworked. On the other hand, the officer who was in the office was overwhelmed because she managed alone the 4 telephones and all the victims’ requests.
At first, we thought that the situation would be resolved quickly, but it was not the case.
We felt less useful because we had a lot less work to do (no more hearings, no reconstruction, no possibility to meet the magistrates, etc.). We had very few contacts with our peers, most of whom also teleworking.
We tried to make appointments by phone, particularly in sentence execution cases, but we quickly noticed that the people quickly lost track and didn’t really understand the procedure outlined. This was very frustrating.
For the current second wave, we are better equipped and more familiar with teleworking. The hearings are still taking place and the investigating judges are continuing their investigations normally or almost normally. On one hand, it has become much easier for us to carry out our work despite the health crisis even if we still feel very lonely when we come to the office. On the other hand, the workload is very heavy when we are at office because we have a lot of administrative work such as sending letters and putting in order the files processed during telework, answering the phone calls) in addition to the usual tasks. Nevertheless, we have come to the conclusion that the work has generally reduced. The confined victims also make less requests on us.
What would you have done differently?
Given the configuration of our premises, we had no choice but to come in turn. Nevertheless, for teleworking, we could perhaps have been quicker and found out more about teleworking or how to put it into practice. We did not know how to connect to the VPN, VoIP phone services
and business applications from home. Now it’s all been sorted out. We have also decided to come to the hearings or the reconstructions so that the duty periods are as much as possible dedicated to receiving new requests. We continue to make appointments at the office for some delicate situations because we are now equipped with Plexiglas screens and antibacterial gel or sprays.
What are the challenges you are facing now?
Maintaining the relationship with the victims that we cannot meet as often as we normally do. Establishing the best possible contact with public prosecutors, examining magistrates, employees and registrars in order to continue to provide users with the best possible
information.
Reflecting on the consequences of teleworking. We have indeed noticed that the police are filing far fewer complaints. When it is the case, they are not always dealt in a short period by the Public Prosecutor’s Office. It is harmful to the victims. We have initiated a discussion with the King’s Prosecutor on this topic.

Related News
Keep up to date with the latest developments, stories, and updates on probation from across Europe and beyond. Find relevant news and insights shaping the field today.
Recap

Probation outside Europe
Governance Oversight and Accountability Mechanisms in Probation and Parole: Compare and Contrast Europe and USA
19/09/2025
Confederation of European Probation (CEP) and American Probation and Parole Association (APPA) organized an insightful webinar that introduced the theme “Governance oversight and accountability mechanisms in Probation and Parole. Compare and contrast Europe and USA”. This event took place on Thursday, 18 September 2025.
Recap

CEP Events, Framework Decisions
Recap: Expert Workshop on Framework Decision 2008/947/JHA and 2009/829/JHA
16/09/2025
The Expert Workshop held on September 10–11, 2025, in Brussels, Belgium, brought together senior managers, probation practitioners, criminal justice professionals such as lawyers and prosecutors from across Europe as well as representatives of the European Commission, Academy of European Law and European Judicial Network to discuss the advancements in the implementation of Framework Decisions 2008/947/JHA and 2009/829/JHA. Hosted at the Houses of Justice, the CEP Expert Workshop served as a dynamic platform for mutual learning, collaboration, and strategic planning.
New

Probation in Europe
New Vodcast Episode: Katharina Heitz on the Ressources-Risk-Inventory in Probation
11/09/2025
The 14th episode of Division_Y features Katharina Heitz, Head of the Central Department for Social Work at the Public Probation and Parole Service Baden-Württemberg, Germany.
Recap

CEP Board, Probation in Europe
CEP at ESC 2025: Penal Policy Transfer and Ageing in Prison in Focus
08/09/2025
The Confederation of European Probation (CEP) had a strong presence at the 25th Annual Conference of the European Society of Criminology (EUROCRIM 2025), held in Athens from 3 to 6 September 2025. As one of Europe’s largest gatherings of criminologists, the ESC annual conference brings together researchers, practitioners, and policymakers from around the world to exchange knowledge on crime, justice, and social responses. This year’s theme was “Logos of Crime and Punishment,” inspired by classical Greek philosophy.

Probation in Europe, Technology
Have Your Say: EU Call for Evidence on the Digitalisation of Justice (2025–2030)
18/08/2025
The European Commission has opened a Call for Evidence on the Digitalisation of Justice: 2025–2030 European Judicial Training Strategy.
Reading corner

Criminal Justice
Parole Futures
18/08/2025
At a time when many parole systems are experiencing considerable strain, the aims of this collection are twofold: first, to encourage systematic and critical reflection on the rationalities, institutions and practices of parole. Second, to think big, and pose ambitious ‘what if’ questions about the possible futures of parole and prison release. Offering novel insights from Asia, Australia, Europe, North America and South America, this collection builds the case for, and then showcases, a ‘way of doing’ parole research that is global in outlook, interdisciplinary in approach and unapologetically normative in character.
Subscribe to our bi-monthly email newsletter!
"*" indicates required fields
- Keep up to date with important probation developments and insights.