Skip to content

News

Domestic abuse victims and COVID-19 epidemic and its implications: a global and national crisis.

Domestic abuse victims during coronavirus is impacting not only our daily lives but some more than others. The pandemic has not only threatened their physical and mental health but also their safety. It is useful to examine the impact that the lockdown has had on domestic abuse figures, the rationale behind this, along with strategies for prevention for the future.

An article written by Stacey Musimbe-Rix from the KSS CRC Research and Policy Unit

Figures of domestic abuse

Domestic abuse is a global problem responsible for more than 87,000 female deaths in 2017 (UNODC, 2018:15). We know that women are disproportionately affected by domestic abuse under ordinary circumstances and the lockdown has only served to exacerbate this inequality. The Office for National Statistics in the UK reported that in the year ending 2019, 80 women in the UK had been killed by an ex-partner or intimate partner which equates to a monthly average of 6.6 women (Office for National Statistics, 2020:810). Unfortunately, emerging evidence has shown a global spike in domestic abuses cases and homicides during the COVID-19 lockdown.
In the United Kingdom, the National Domestic Abuse Helpline reported that, on Monday 6 April, the calls to the helpline soared by 120% and visits to the website rose by 700% compared to the previous day (Independent, 2020). In Brighton, the local domestic abuse charity reported that they had a 150% increase in calls to their local helpline. Ingala Smith (2020) recounted that, in the nine days preceding the coronavirus lock down announcement, there were 8 domestic homicides recorded in the UK and this is in comparison to 8 homicides recorded in the previous month. In the period 23 March-12 April 2020 there were 14 domestic homicides, the highest figure recorded for 11 years. The increased figures are consistent with figures reported in other countries such as France which reported a 36% increase in domestic abuse cases; China reported a threefold increase in reported domestic abuse cases in February and Lebanon reported that domestic abuse figures have doubled since the lock down (The Times, 2020). The only reported anomaly has been in Scotland which reported a 20% decrease in calls and online visits to their helpline service since the lockdown.

Disconcerting but not unexpected

The domestic homicides and rising domestic abuse cases are disconcerting but not unexpected. Johnson (2005) theorises that domestic abuse can be situational and in the case of the lockdown- personal stress due to health concerns and economic hardship can serve as a catalyst for violence in the home. According to Bristol Cable (2020) ‘studies show that abusers are more likely to murder their partners in the wake of personal crises, and when families are together for a long time without the usual outlets like going to work.. lockdown is a mixture of the two.’
What we need to be careful of, is to blame coronavirus for domestic abuse (Ingala-Smith, 2020) As with many other triggers for domestic abuse, the lockdown is likely to amplify a preexisting problem not create it. The lockdown is the perfect storm for domestic abuse as victims are more vulnerable and there is more opportunity for perpetrators to exercise control. Domestic abuse is widely acknowledged by many scholars (Stark 2007; Dobash & Dobash, 1992) as rooted in power and control, therefore domestic abuse can escalate when the perpetrator feels they are losing control (Monckton-Smith, 2019). Notably, in many domestic homicides- coercive control was present within the relationship (Monckton-Smith, 2019). Many survivors of abuse have reported that perpetrators have been using lockdown rules to further control them and their children. KSS CRC probation service has seen a trend in perpetrators threatening to infect victims and children with CO-VID-19 as a means of maintaining control. Moreover, domestic abuse thrives in isolation and the physical isolation from support networks means that victims could be experiencing higher rates of abuse without intervention. KSS CRC has found that some victims are minimising the abuse during phone conversations, perhaps due to the perpetrator’s constant presence.

Pragmatic responses across the world

Given the extent of the problem it is important to document some pragmatic responses across the world. There has been an increase in funding across come countries – in France the government pledged hotel rooms for those escaping domestic abuse. There is anecdotal evidence of domestic abuse victims around Europe using local pharmacies to ask for help. Boots UK has started an initiative where victims can visit one of their local pharmacies to ask for help. Some police forces in the UK have asked delivery drivers and postal workers to look out for signs of domestic abuse in homes. In Brighton, virtual Multi Agency Risk Assessment Conferences (MARAC) have been convened in order to continue safeguarding the highest risk victims of domestic abuse.

Prepare for future crises

Despite such efforts, it is important to reflect on our domestic abuse preparedness for future crises. Research has shown us that domestic abuse is likely to increase during times of national crisis and when families spend long periods together. As such, we need to develop preventative rather than reactionary policies that will mitigate a probable surge in domestic abuse during such times. Not only are policies important, COVID-19 shows us that where possible, intervention should happen at the earliest possible opportunity. The onus should not fall on domestic abuse organisations, and the survivors, to keep themselves safe. Keeping victims safe is everyone’s responsibility.

For the complete fact file click here.

Related News

Keep up to date with the latest developments, stories, and updates on probation from across Europe and beyond. Find relevant news and insights shaping the field today.

Recap

Violent Extremism

Recap: Expert Group meeting on Violent Extremism

16/03/2026

On 12–13 March 2026, the Expert Group on Violent Extremism convened for an in‑person meeting in Bucharest, Romania. Hosted at the University of Bucharest, the meeting brought together practitioners and representatives from across Europe to finalise the overview of best practices for preventive interventions targeting juveniles and young adults up to the age of 26 under probation. Building on the extensive discussions and progress made in 2025, the group worked collaboratively to bring the document to completion.

Recap

Electronic monitoring

Recap: CEP Expert Group meeting at ATGV Antalya

12/03/2026

The CEP Expert Group on Electronic Monitoring, along with representatives of the CEP Office led by Mr. Daniel Danglades, CEP Vice-President, visited the Education and Social Facility of the Ministry of Justice in Türkiye – ATGV Antalya. The host country was represented by a high-level delegation, including Deputy Director General Mr. Fatih Güngör, Head of the Turkish Probation Department Dr. Hüseyin Şık, Member of the CEP EM Expert Group Ms. Elçin Kilecioğlu, as well as the Director and representatives of the ATGV facility, and officials from the courts, prosecution, and probation services in Antalya.

Recap

Education and Training

Recap: CEP Expert Network on Education and Training in Probation meets with the European Commission to discuss the EU Judicial Training Strategy

11/03/2026

On 11 March 2026, the CEP Expert Network on Education and Training in Probation met online with more than 20 participants from Belgium, Denmark, Sweeden, France, Romania, Croatia, Catalonia, Poland, United Kingdom and Türkiye to exchange views with the European Commission on the newly adopted EU Judicial Training Strategy 2025–2030.

The meeting provided a valuable opportunity for representatives of probation training institutions across Europe to engage directly with European Commission officials and discuss how the strategy may impact the training of probation and prison staff in the coming years.

Probation Journal

Women, youth

Understanding the needs of girls and young women in youth justice

10/03/2026

New research highlights the underlying needs that influence girls’ and young women’s contact with youth justice systems and calls for more gender responsive approaches in policy and practice. Drawing on a review of recent studies, the authors identify several factors shaping girls’ pathways into the justice system, including persistent abuse, trauma, gendered expectations, and systemic failures. Girls involved in youth justice are often affected by multiple forms of victimisation, such as sexual abuse, neglect, and domestic violence, with experiences frequently beginning in early childhood.

New

CEP Board

Interview with new CEP board member Ian Barrow

09/03/2026

During the General Assembly in Austria, a new CEP Board got elected for the upcoming three years. In the coming weeks we will publish interviews with all newly-elected board members where they will share information on their professional background, how they would like to contribute, what challenges lie ahead and many more.

Enjoy reading!

New

Gender Equality, Gender-based violence

Women’s Day

09/03/2026

Yesterday was International Women’s Day.

At CEP, this day closely reflects our core values and ongoing commitment to promoting gender equality and addressing gender-based violence within the context of probation and community justice.

Subscribe to our bi-monthly email newsletter!