Previous Article
News
Dealing with the issue of radicalisation – the German case in Lower Saxony
Radicalisation, especially terrorism and violent extremism, have become increasingly important for the probation and prison service in recent years. Around 1.000 German jihadists have traveled to the IS militia, to Syria or Iraq to participate in combat operations or to support them in other ways. About one third came back to Germany, more than 150 died. There is a lot of discussion at a technical and political level about how to handle radicalised people or returnees in prison and probation or how others can be protected from becoming radicalised. For Germany, dealing with this topic is anything but easy. Responsibility for the penal system and the probation service lies with the federal states. We have at least sixteen federal states in Germany, with 180 prisons and 64.351 inmates (reporting date 30.11.2017) and 182.715 persons under probation/parole (reporting date 31.12.2011). Statistical data on persons in prison or those under probation who are extremists does not exist. In other words: the Federal Government can make the legal framework, but the implementation of concepts, etc. for dealing with such groups of people is carried out by the federal states.
In the last two to three years, there have been different impulses at a federal level to deal with the topic of radicalisation in the probation and prison service. An example is the new funding programme of the German Federal Government with the title ‘Prevention and De-radicalisation in Prison and Probation” of the federal programme Live Democracy. The Federal Government supports one project per federal state from 2017 to 2020 to prevent radicalisation in prison and probation. The target group for these projects is juvenile offenders. The global objectives of the programme are: to recognise and prevent radicalisation in prison and probation, to avoid discrimination, to interrupt the radicalisation processes, to support exits and to build networks.
Another example is legal changes at a federal level. Since one year ago, the Federal Republic of Germany changed the criminal law. It is now possible to use electronic monitoring for persons who are preparing a serious act of violent subversion, are financing terrorism or who are supporting a national or foreign terrorist organisation.
An example of how a federal state works with radicalisation is presented below by Lower Saxony.
Probation work with violent extremist offenders in Lower Saxony
In addition to criminal jurisdiction, the public prosecution offices and the law enforcement institutions, the AJSD (agency for criminal justice social work in Lower Saxony) is the fourth pillar of the administration of criminal justice in Lower Saxony. About 450 employees, who perform duties in the fields of probation service, supervision and court assistance, are working in the AJSD.
Although the probation service in Lower Saxony has been dealing with the topic of radicalisation (mostly right and left wing extremism) before, working with religiously motivated violent extremist offenders (VEOs) is rather new. Until now, the number of probationers convicted of terror related crimes is small, but more of them are expected to be released from prison in the near future. Working with this group of people represents a particular challenge for probation officers. VEOs are estimated to have a high risk of reoffending and cause a serious threat to public security. Probation measures, like keeping someone away from certain persons or from certain mosques, are difficult to control by the ambulant means of the probation service.
Moreover, those cases are often already known to the media, which may cause a negative degree of attention around the offender, which is obstructive for the reintegration process. It is a balancing act between the interest of security authorities in the experiences of the probation officers working with a VEO and the professional secrecy as a crucial base of probation work. To enable a trustful working relationship with a VEO, transparency about the reporting commitment and handling of information still has to be ensured.
There is an urgent necessity of combined efforts of different institutions. In Lower Saxony NGOs specialised in exit work can be involved in the assistance of VEOs during the prison term already and continue working with the VEO after release in cooperation with the probation service. A close transition management at an early stage is very important. Several months before and regularly after the release of a VEO, case conferences managed by the State Office of Criminal Investigation take place, involving all relevant stake holders, like police officers of the State Office of Criminal Investigation, prison management, probation officers and representatives of law enforcement authorities. Those conferences are aimed at harmonising tasks and interventions and mutual exchange of information within the bounds of professional secrecy. Meanwhile, every VEO is surveyed before release by a special assessment unit within the penintentiary in Hannover.
To prepare probation officers for working with VEOs and create confidence on dealing with the topic of radicalisation in general mandatory, awareness trainings have been organised in the AJSD. Moreover, two probation officers have attended special trainings in the field of religiously motivated extremism, who serve as contact persons and knowledge multipliers.

Related News
Keep up to date with the latest developments, stories, and updates on probation from across Europe and beyond. Find relevant news and insights shaping the field today.
Recap

Probation outside Europe
Governance Oversight and Accountability Mechanisms in Probation and Parole: Compare and Contrast Europe and USA
19/09/2025
Confederation of European Probation (CEP) and American Probation and Parole Association (APPA) organized an insightful webinar that introduced the theme “Governance oversight and accountability mechanisms in Probation and Parole. Compare and contrast Europe and USA”. This event took place on Thursday, 18 September 2025.
Recap

CEP Events, Framework Decisions
Recap: Expert Workshop on Framework Decision 2008/947/JHA and 2009/829/JHA
16/09/2025
The Expert Workshop held on September 10–11, 2025, in Brussels, Belgium, brought together senior managers, probation practitioners, criminal justice professionals such as lawyers and prosecutors from across Europe as well as representatives of the European Commission, Academy of European Law and European Judicial Network to discuss the advancements in the implementation of Framework Decisions 2008/947/JHA and 2009/829/JHA. Hosted at the Houses of Justice, the CEP Expert Workshop served as a dynamic platform for mutual learning, collaboration, and strategic planning.
New

Probation in Europe
New Vodcast Episode: Katharina Heitz on the Ressources-Risk-Inventory in Probation
11/09/2025
The 14th episode of Division_Y features Katharina Heitz, Head of the Central Department for Social Work at the Public Probation and Parole Service Baden-Württemberg, Germany.
Recap

CEP Board, Probation in Europe
CEP at ESC 2025: Penal Policy Transfer and Ageing in Prison in Focus
08/09/2025
The Confederation of European Probation (CEP) had a strong presence at the 25th Annual Conference of the European Society of Criminology (EUROCRIM 2025), held in Athens from 3 to 6 September 2025. As one of Europe’s largest gatherings of criminologists, the ESC annual conference brings together researchers, practitioners, and policymakers from around the world to exchange knowledge on crime, justice, and social responses. This year’s theme was “Logos of Crime and Punishment,” inspired by classical Greek philosophy.

Probation in Europe, Technology
Have Your Say: EU Call for Evidence on the Digitalisation of Justice (2025–2030)
18/08/2025
The European Commission has opened a Call for Evidence on the Digitalisation of Justice: 2025–2030 European Judicial Training Strategy.
Reading corner

Criminal Justice
Parole Futures
18/08/2025
At a time when many parole systems are experiencing considerable strain, the aims of this collection are twofold: first, to encourage systematic and critical reflection on the rationalities, institutions and practices of parole. Second, to think big, and pose ambitious ‘what if’ questions about the possible futures of parole and prison release. Offering novel insights from Asia, Australia, Europe, North America and South America, this collection builds the case for, and then showcases, a ‘way of doing’ parole research that is global in outlook, interdisciplinary in approach and unapologetically normative in character.
Subscribe to our bi-monthly email newsletter!
"*" indicates required fields
- Keep up to date with important probation developments and insights.