An article by Kieran McCartan, Professor in Criminology, University of the West of England
Evidence based practice is the gold standard that we all strive for! We want to know that something works before we implement it, before it impacts our professional practice, the lives of our clients and the broader community. This is particularly important in the field of criminal justice, especially when you are dealing with high risk individuals, their assessment, management and integration; where the consequences of getting something wrong can be significant and damaging on several levels. As professionals we are held accountable for the decisions that we make, both in terms our failures and our successes; therefore, we need to be sure that we are working in an informed and effective way. This means that we must balance what we know, through our experiences and knowledge, about what works with people who have committed serious offending and what the prescribed, accepted, approved processes and interventions are. Which can result in a quandary, how do you move practice forward at a pace that recognises innovation, evaluation and responsible risk management?
We need to be constantly committed to research, develop an effective, fit for purpose evidence base and with practice being rooted in robust, empirical working; however, this takes time and costs money! The challenge of evidence-based practice is that you need to wait for the evidence to develop which means ongoing research projects concluding, recommendations being taken on and implemented. Which takes time and is often juxtaposed to lived reality where things often need to be implemented immediately. We end up in a situation where everything changes, or nothing changes, where the pendulum swings being effectively evidence-based policy and emotionally driven populist public policy. This is a narrative that hear a lot in criminal justice, implement change quickly and then discover that it may not work the way that we want it. Attending conferences and taking with professionals and practitioners across the criminal justice spectrum I often hear “but it does not work in practice” or “our hands our tied, this may not work but its what we have to roll out”, all of which leaves staff feeling undervalued, underappreciated and silenced. This is problematic, we need to value the experience and knowledge of professionals and practitioners because as frontline staff they are the ones working with clients (or people with a criminal conviction) daily, seeing what works and what does not. We need to trust and rely upon our staff and their knowledge base in, they need to be involved in developing evidence-based practice not simply being informed of it. It is important to recognise the need for practice informed research, which means that staff and clients need to be involved in the process and that it cannot simply be left to external, independent researchers not linked, or tied into real world practice.
We need a paradigm shift back to the days of co-creation because the most important thing in effective risk management is collaboration and partnership working, therefore it stands to reason that the most important aspect of developing an evidence base is the same. The relationship between the professional research advisory boards and/or the involvement of research-practitioner in collaboration with the external academic is essential. The only way that we know if any research is fit for purpose and the outcomes will function in practice is through partnership working. The model of research into practice co-creation has faded somewhat over the last number of years with a focus on externally commissioned completely independent research, which was then followed by all research moving in house and being non-independent to, what some would say, a position of no research being done in practice or a token gesture towards research. Research, in the main, has become about justifying policy and evidencing current practice, which although important cannot be the limits of research as it also has to be about innovation. Practitioners and professionals need to feel invested in the research that impacts their working so that they understand where it has come from and can implement it appropriately. Co-creation and collaboration results in an upskilled workforce that is critical, understands the role of research and thinks with an analytical frame as well as a practice based one; meaning that all staff being evidence based and research informed! This upskilling means that staff use their research grounding, developed through their training and maintained by professional development, in an effective way daily and that their decisions become evidence informed. It means that professional development becomes relevant, it becomes more that “I have to attend this course so I can get the CPD points” or “I’m reading this article in my spare time because I have to”. Staff need to become invested in the research and practice that means something to them and develops their working lives in a meaningful way.
What does an effective research and practice collaboration look like in real terms? Co-creation means that professionals and practitioners can help set the research agenda, they can enable researcher to address real world concerns that are faced in practice through informed evaluations or innovate intervention development and roll out. Research in practice needs to become rooted in action research methodologies, where the tools that used are fit for purpose and that the recommendations are implemented as the research progresses. As everyone is involved in the development and execution of the research, then everyone is aware of the outcomes and how they fit into practice and therefore change, through evidence-based practice, becomes organic and not post-hoc.