Previous Article
News
A portrait of a small probation organisation: Service Central d’Assistance Sociale Luxembourg
Every probation organisation in Europe is different from the other, although most of them have a lot of similarities. There are some that are different from all the others. I’m talking about the smallest member organisations of the CEP. In this special series of articles, you can read about what makes them special, how they function, about the positives of working in a small organisation and about the difficulties that are sometimes faced. In this edition we take a look at Service Central d’Assistance Sociale Luxemburg. Probation Officer Claude Kettel tells us about the organisation.
Luxemburg, also named the Grand Duchy Luxemburg, is a small country in between Germany, France and Belgium. The probation service exists of nineteen probation officers and three secretaries. The team also includes two craftsman that take care of the offenders serving community sanctions.
The probation service is part of a bigger organisation named Service Central d’Assistance Sociale (SCAS). In this organisation all the social services in Luxemburg are gathered, for example the child protection service, probation service, victim support and the “tutorship” service for persons placed under protective measures/guardianship.
Positives
Claude Kettel describes his country as a “small village”. According to him it has a lot of positives working in a team with only a few co-workers: “In a small organisation it is possible to work with a very personal approach. Our continuous care (end-to-end) model is efficient and very thorough, considering the closeness of the relationship. This is generally a very positive aspect, but sometimes you get to close to the person, so you have to preserve your impartiality. But there are more advantages: “We are surrounded by big neighbour countries, that often make us realise how small we actually are. This leads naturally to having an open mind regarding different or new thinking and practice.”
In Luxemburg probation officers also get the opportunity to pick up many different tasks. Claude Kettel is for example in charge of electronic monitoring, prison treatment groups/meetings, pardon commissions and financial aid to released prisoner. “When you work in a small team like ours, you have to be very flexible.”
Challenges
Working for the Luxemburg Probation Service also comes with some challenges. One of these challenges for Claude Kettel is building up a network of volunteers. “The public often tends to be not so open-minded and even avoidant when it comes to ex-detainees. We need to see if this model can be used in Luxemburg.”
The population of Luxemburg is getting more diverse and multicultural through the years, according to Claude Kettel this unfortunately also results in a high rate of foreign prisoners in Luxemburg. “This is not an easy challenge. The reintegration of some of these offenders tends to be very difficult here.”
Differences
Although the probation officers in Luxemburg do work that is very comparable to the work of probation officers in other countries, there are also many differences. “Some topics, like radicalisation, are not an issue for Luxemburg. It does not mean that those subjects do not attract our interest, but I have to admit that it certainly has not got as much attention as in other countries, like France or Germany.”
Luxemburg is too small to have training facilities for probation officers, which is, according to Claude Kettel, not a bad difference. “The lack of such programmes had the advantage that we were forced to reach out to other countries and participate in their training programmes, which had the positive effect that we got wider perspectives, and insight in different national systems.”
Another important difference between the Luxemburg Probation Service and bigger organisations is the fact that they have been rather free to develop their own internal organisational structure. “Big countries have ministerial divisions in charge of the theoretical and practical organisation of the work, we had to develop most of our methodology by ourselves. This was only done in agreement with our hierarchic chief, the Delegate of the Prosecutor General.”
Related News
Keep up to date with the latest developments, stories, and updates on probation from across Europe and beyond. Find relevant news and insights shaping the field today.
Recap
Electronic monitoring, Technology
14th Electronic Monitoring Conference, Electronic Monitoring in a Changing World – Perception vs Reality
08/10/2026
On 6-8 October 2026, Antalya hosted the 14th Electronic Monitoring Conference “Electronic Monitoring in a Changing World – Perception vs Reality”. More than 350 participants coming from 30 countries across Europe and worldwide representing probation services, Ministries of Justice, victims´ services, EM providers, researchers as well as local participants representing the Turkish Prison and Probation Service gathered to discuss how electronic monitoring (EM) is understood by all stakeholders involved including the victims and the public, and how these perceptions compare to the evidence and experiences of those affected. While the gap between perception and reality in electronic monitoring has been recognised for over a decade, the rapid expansion of EM into areas such as victim protection, high-risk supervision and digital innovation has brought new challenges and questions to the forefront.
Recap
ITSCCS
Core Correctional Skills in Digital Probation: highlights from the 6th ITSCCS in Barcelona
05/10/2026
The sixth International Training School on Core Correctional Skills (ITSCCS) took place in Barcelona from 28 September to 2 October 2026, bringing together 26 participants for a week of learning, practical training and international exchange. Organised by the Confederation of European Probation (CEP) and the Centre for Legal Studies and Specialised Training (CEJFE), the programme focused on “Clicks and Empathy: Core Correctional Skills in Digital Probation.”
Recap
Framework Decisions
Recap: ERA workshop on Framework Decisions 829 and 947 in Bucharest
02/10/2026
CEP Vice-President Daniel Danglades, Ambassador Gerry McNally and Policy Officer Mirka Jakesova participated in the Seminar on Framework Decisions 829 and 947 and their Impact on Alternatives in the EU organized under the EU project run by the Academy of European Law on 28-29 September in Bucharest, Romania. The seminar brought together judges, prosecutors, probation practitioners, academics, and policy experts to discuss the growing role of alternatives to detention within European criminal justice systems.
New
CEP
CEP and Catalan justice leaders reaffirm longstanding cooperation
29/09/2026
Representatives of the Confederation of European Probation (CEP) met with senior officials from the Catalan Department of Justice and Democratic Quality in Barcelona on 28 September 2026, alongside the opening of the sixth International Training School on Core Correctional Skills. The meeting offered an opportunity to recognise a longstanding partnership and discuss its continued development.
Updated
Mental Health
DEADLINE EXTENDED: Call for Pilot Implementation of the European Mental Health Training Curriculum
29/09/2026
Good news for CEP members! Following requests from our members, CEP has extended the deadline to apply for the pilot implementation of the European Mental Health Training Curriculum for Probation Officers.
Recap
ITSCCS, Technology
6th International Training School opens in Barcelona with a focus on digital probation
28/09/2026
How can probation professionals use new technologies in their interactions while building trust, showing empathy and supporting change? This question is at the heart of the sixth International Training School on Core Correctional Skills, which opened in Barcelona on 28 September 2026.
Subscribe to our bi-monthly email newsletter!
"*" indicates required fields
- Keep up to date with important probation developments and insights.